Can image noise help identify manipulated scientific figures?
Scientific images have different properties from everyday photographs. This preprint develops a detector tailored to scientific imagery and tests whether inconsistencies in image noise can reveal manipulated regions.
What the study found
- The method is trained and evaluated using manipulated western blot and microscopy images.
- On the reported benchmarks, it outperformed the general-purpose image-tampering methods used for comparison.
How the study works
The work constructs scientific-image manipulation datasets and learns to detect noise inconsistencies associated with edits.
Scope and limitations
- Benchmark performance on these image types does not establish performance on every scientific imaging modality.
- A detector output is a signal to inspect the source material, not a determination of research misconduct.
Read the original abstract and paper.
Cite this work
Ziyue Xiang, Daniel E. Acuna (2020). Scientific Image Tampering Detection Based On Noise Inconsistencies: A Method And Datasets. arXiv:2001.07799. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.07799
View BibTeX
@article{xiang2020tampering,
title = {Scientific Image Tampering Detection Based On Noise Inconsistencies: A Method And Datasets},
author = {Xiang, Ziyue and Acuna, Daniel E.},
year = {2020},
publication_date = {2020-01-21},
journal = {arXiv:2001.07799},
doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2001.07799},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.07799}
}
Overview checked September 7, 2026 against the publication record. Publication and preprint dates refer to the linked versions.