Join Us

Learn how we develop research ideas, support students, and work toward scientific independence at the Science of Science & Computational Discovery Lab at CU Boulder.

Mentoring and research development

Daniel Acuna’s mentoring approach combines a structured start with increasing ownership of research. Students receive close guidance early on and continued support as they develop their own direction. The stages below describe a typical progression; the pace depends on each student’s experience and the needs of the research.

First year: a structured start

Students usually begin with a project Daniel has already thought through and selected to fit their skills and learning goals. They also contribute to ongoing lab projects. This provides early experience with the research process: reading critically, designing studies, analyzing data, and communicating findings.

Second year: shaping a direction

We discuss which questions, methods, and experiences the student found most interesting. Together, we define a follow-up study that builds on this experience. The student takes greater responsibility for framing the question, choosing methods, and planning the work, with feedback throughout.

Year three onward: leading research

Students are increasingly expected to develop their own questions and lead the research. They make and justify decisions about study design, interpretation, and collaboration. Daniel’s role shifts toward discussing ideas, challenging assumptions, and helping resolve obstacles as students develop an independent research agenda.

Later stages: completing the Ph.D.

Mentoring continues as students bring their work into a coherent dissertation and prepare for their next role. Support includes feedback on writing, research talks, and career plans, along with introductions and recommendations relevant to the student’s goals.

Professional development throughout

Across these stages, Daniel helps students build professional relationships, encourages conference presentations, and provides opportunities to practice talks and respond to questions. Students learn to explain their work to specialists and broader audiences, and to build recognition for their contributions across disciplines, professions, and backgrounds.

Commitments that support this progression

  • Shared expectations. Agree on meeting frequency, communication, feedback timelines, and project responsibilities. Discuss authorship and credit early, and revisit expectations as contributions change.
  • A development plan that evolves. Set research, skill-building, and career goals together. Revisit the plan at least annually and when priorities change, including options within and beyond academia.
  • Feedback in both directions. Give specific, actionable feedback and invite students to say when they need more guidance, more independence, or a different approach. Make room for disagreement, questions, and learning from unsuccessful studies.
  • A network of mentors. Encourage relationships with peers, committee members, collaborators, and professionals whose experience complements the lab’s. Help students find advice suited to their interests and next steps.
  • Sustainable and inclusive working practices. Discuss workload, time away, accessibility needs, and personal circumstances without assuming everyone needs the same support. Address difficulties early and connect students with appropriate campus resources.

These commitments draw on the National Academies’ synthesis of mentoring research, Cornell’s guidance for graduate mentors, and CU Boulder’s mentoring and development resources.

Research with AI

Our recent work uses an AI-first approach to developing ideas and prototypes. We start by identifying a scientific direction and the question we want to answer, then spend substantial time challenging the idea before committing to a full study.

  1. Challenge the proposal. Use AI to explore competing explanations, counterexamples, and skeptical reviewer perspectives. A game-theoretic perspective asks how people with different incentives might respond to a proposed system or exploit weaknesses in an evaluation.
  2. Refine the argument. Summarize the strongest objections, identify assumptions, and specify what evidence would change our minds. Revise the question and study design in response.
  3. Prototype and revise. Use AI to build early implementations and run small tests. Compare results with the original aims and revise the approach, sometimes through several changes of direction.

Students remain responsible for understanding and explaining the work. We check sources, inspect and test generated code, and evaluate claims against data. AI critiques help us identify questions to investigate; agreement among AI outputs does not establish that an idea is correct. We document consequential changes so that rapid iteration remains traceable.

Ph.D. applications

Our research covers the science of science, research integrity, peer review, and computational discovery. Prospective Ph.D. students apply through the Department of Computer Science.

Program
Computer Science Ph.D.
Application requirements

Application process

  1. Review our research areas and recent publications to assess how your interests align with the lab.
  2. Consult the Computer Science Ph.D. application instructions for current deadlines, required materials, and submission procedures.
  3. Submit your application through CU Boulder and indicate Daniel Acuna as a faculty member you are interested in working with.

Application inquiries

Please do not email the principal investigator about individual Ph.D. applications. We are unable to respond to these inquiries individually.

For questions about the application process, contact Computer Science graduate admissions. Information about financial support is available on the department’s funding opportunities page.

Other research opportunities

Master’s students

The lab is not currently recruiting master’s students.

Undergraduate students

The lab is not currently recruiting undergraduate students.

Visiting scholars

Prospective visiting scholars with independent funding and availability for at least six months may contact Daniel Acuna. Previous visiting scholars have received support from the China Scholarship Council.